No CCTV - campaigning against camera surveillance in the uk and beyond
no cctv

Site Search:

Privacy Protected search  
Latest Articles/News

Open letter to UK Surveillance Regulators - A healthy society depends on the law-abiding majority being respected and trusted as they go about their daily lives... more...

Where to mate? 1984 please - Taxi cameras are part of a growing ''just in case'' mentality that treats everyone as suspects... more...

Britain under attack from 'talking' CCTV cameras - which stifle the very civic spirit they ''seek'' to create... more...

Internet Eyes and media politics - ''Let's bury our bad news on a busy news day'' says ICO... more...

Back to the Future - UK CCTV debate stuck in time loop - Imagine if you had a time machine could travel back to the 1990s... more...

Royston's ANPR ''Ring of Steel'' - a phrase coined to describe extreme measures now standard police ops?... more...

Surveillance Camera Code Con - the aims of such a Code are to entrench and expand the use of surveillance... more...

No CCTV's Freedoms Bill submission - there are constitutional, philosophical and sociological issues that must be explored... more...

CCTV / ANPR and the Manufacture of Consent - CCTV proposals in Protection of Freedoms Bill are really about manufacturing consent... more...

Face Covering: Guest Article - the Forward Intelligence Team is a particularly grotesque tentacle of the State... more...

Mr Jolly at Parliamentary Committee - little to celebrate in Protection of Freedoms Bill... more...

Protection of whose Freedoms Bill? - what does the Government really hope to achieve with The Protection of Freedoms Bill in relation to CCTV... more...

Exposing Naked Scanners - the core issue becomes whether this is the sort of world in which we want to live... more...

Bad Boy of the Week - ever wondered how Britain came to be watched by more cameras than any other nation?... more...

BrumiLeaks, CCTV and democracy - leaked emails reveal lengths to which advocates of cameras will go... more...

The true cost of CCTV? - Big Brother Watch's report reiterates that CCTV cameras are a massive waste of money... more...

ICO's Surveillance Society follow up report - should have been a dire warning but lacks bite... more...

CCTV citizen spy game launches - another disturbing chapter in Britain's surveillance society... more...

Freedom not Fear demo in Germany - a protest of this magnitude against state surveillance is presently inconceivable in the UK... more...

Speed Cameras, ANPR and Project Columbus - the expansion of automated chekpoints around the UK... more...

NO CCTV - Action Page

Oxford, Time to challenge Cowley Road CCTV trial!

Contact oxford@no-cctv.org.uk to get involved.

cowley road camera locations
The position of the three cameras along the Cowley Road

From 2007 No CCTV campaigned against cameras on the Cowley Road East Oxford. The original plan was for eight permanent fixed cameras. After months of campaigning a "compromise" of three wireless/removable cameras for a trial period was chosen by the council (No CCTV did not agree to this proposal).

In January 2009 three CCTV cameras were installed along the Cowley Road as part of a two year trial. That trial is now coming to an end and we need campaigners in Oxford to help us challenge the trial and get the cameras taken down.

The trial must be challenged. If it is not the council will expand the surveillance along the Cowley Road. It is unlikely that the council will respond correctly to the trial even if it shows that CCTV had no effect at all. In 2009 the council rolled out CCTV cameras in tower blocks across Oxford despite a trial in Foresters Tower that showed that the cameras were of no use (see No CCTV's article 'CCTV in tower blocks - the lies reach new heights').

There have been extensive studies of CCTV all over the world that show that CCTV is not an effective crime fighting tool. The Cowley Road trial if conducted correctly will have come to the same conclusion.

The Campbell Collaboration study 'Effects of Closed Circuit Television Surveillance on Crime' (download here) conducted by Brandon C. Welsh and David P. Farrington found that CCTV cameras in public spaces such as those on the Cowley Road "did not have a significant effect on crime". Welsh and Farrington obtained 92 CCTV evaluations, only 44 met the criteria for inclusion in their study and 41 of the 44 studies could be used in the meta-analysis.

Welsh and Farrington only included studies that followed a strict methodology. In March 2009 a Freedom of Information request was made to Oxford City Council asking for the "Methodology used in CCTV trial on Cowley Road" (see the full request at the WhatDoTheyKnow website). When asked "What independent assessment will there be of the trial?" Oxford City council replied that the "assessment will be undertaken by Oxford City Council in partnership with Thames Valley Police". They were not able to supply details of control areas being used to asses the trial. The council said that "crime and anti-social behaviour statistics, camera usage data and incidents involving CCTV by incident type" were being collected for the trial.

In July of last year the Oxford Mail newspaper reported that since May 2010 businesses on the Cowley Road were trialling a new Radio Link scheme that "allows retailers and licencees to alert police and CCTV operators to any trouble" ('Traders get radio link to fight crime', oxford Mail, 26th July 2010 - http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/8291730.Traders_get_radio_link_to_fight_crime/). It was reported that "Businesses pay approximately £1 a day" for the link. Is this an appropriate measure to trial during a CCTV trial? How will this be factored into the CCTV trial results?

In November 2007 No CCTV presented a report to the East Area parliament urging them to look at the paltry evidence of cctv's effectiveness and to consider the dangers of cctv to local residents. Decisions by elected representatives should be evidence based and can have far reaching implications. Download the report here. In the report we told councillors that to conduct a fair trial they should bring in independent assessors. Our advice was ignored.

Action Details

If you are an Oxford resident, particularly if you live in East Oxford and you care about this issue then please get in touch at oxford@no-cctv.org.uk.

  • Write to your local councillors, expressing your concerns and calling for proper scrutiny of the trial (see the Oxford City council website for details)
  • Attend meetings of the East Area Parliament and make sure that your concerns are heard
  • Write to the local papers explaining your concerns about the cameras and the way in which the trial has been conducted (see the Oxford City council website for details)
  • Write to the councillor Sajjad-Hussain Malik (cllrsmalik@oxford.gov.uk, the City Executive Board Member for Safer Communities, expressing your concerns. Ask why large sums of public money are being poured into a technology proven to be ineffective other than in eroding the privacy of law abiding citizens and encouraging an environment of distrust. The Council should be required to prove unequivocally their claims about state surveillance before they are permitted to spend any public money in this way. To date they have not provided a shred of substantive evidence supporting their claims.

We need to act NOW to stop the cameras.

See the No CCTV on the Cowley Road campaign page for more information:
http://www.no-cctv.org.uk/campaigns/no_cctv_on_cowley_road.asp